Language Sites
  • UCAN China
  • UCAN India
  • UCAN Indonesia
  • UCAN Vietnam

Top Indian court in landmark rape ruling

Intercourse on broken promise of marriage is not a sex attack, it rules

Top Indian court in landmark rape ruling

A view of India's Supreme Court, which has passed a new judgment on rape (Sajjad Hussain / AFP)

Swati Deb, New Delhi
India

May 22, 2013

Mail This Article
(For more than one recipient, type addresses separated by commas)


India’s Supreme Court has ruled that sex on a promise of a marriage that then doesn’t take place cannot be termed rape, in what observers are saying is a step forward towards recognizing free choice with regards to sexual relations in India.

The judgment came in the case of a woman who had accused a man of raping her after he declined to marry her, despite her consenting to sex on the promise of a subsequent marriage.

“Consent may be express or implied, coerced or misguided, obtained willingly or through deceit," top court Justices B.S. Chauhan and Dipak Misra said.

The court said a "clear distinction" exists between rape and consensual sex and the legal system must examine whether the accused had actually wanted to marry the victim, or had ulterior motives and had made a false promise only to satisfy his lust.

The court noted that rape reduces women to animals, but that sex on consent cannot be equated with rape.

A lower court in Haryana had handed a seven year sentence to the accused, a judgment upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. However, the accused was acquitted by the Supreme Court after having served three years in jail.

Observers have responded positively to the verdict. An editorial in the Times of India yesterday welcomed the judgment as a "big step forward."

“Cohabitation between men and women, hitherto considered immoral and forbidden, appears to be gradually finding judicial acceptance," it said. The court ruling can "go some way towards reshaping social mores related to sex between adults" and shifts definitions of rape to one that "violates a woman's consent and choice, rather than that which offends conservative norms."

Social worker Jiten Singh, of the Lok Andolan (People's Movement), echoed the sentiment. “The ruling will go a long way in pushing the case of individual rights of grown up adults about sex and perhaps redefine rape in the context of modern life," he said.

UCAN needs your support to continue our independent journalism
Access to UCAN stories is completely free of charge - however it costs a significant amount of money to provide our unique content. UCAN relies almost entirely on donations from our readers and donor organizations that support our mission. If you are a regular reader and are able to support us financially, please consider making a donation. Click here to donate now.
La Civiltà Cattolica
 

LATEST

Support Our Journalism

Access to UCAN stories is completely free of charge - however it costs a significant amount of money to provide our unique content. UCAN relies almost entirely on donations from our readers and donor organizations that support our mission. If you are a regular reader and are able to support us financially, please consider making a donation.

Quick Donate

Or choose your own donation amount