UCAN needs your support
You are why we do what we do - report, describe, comment, review. It is to bring to your eyes just what life is like for believers across Asia that we publish UCAN.
But as you know, the effort needs to be sustained if it is to have continuing effect.
UCAN publishes some 150 stories a week in four languages across six websites. We are grateful to benefactors in Europe and the US who support us. But those countries and the Church there are under increasing financial strain and their generosity no longer covers our costs.
We need financial help from our readers to sustain our efforts. Our reporters, editors, video producers and photographers all have families and we need to support them. They do excellent jobs, but they can't do their jobs for nothing.
Will you help us to sustain UCAN? Please click here to help.
Thanks in anticipation.
Fr. Michael Kelly SJ
What to do with a bishop convicted of an abuse cover-up?
Since his landmark guilty verdict, Bishop Finn still runs a diocese - yet he would not be allowed to teach in one of its Sunday schools.
- David Gibson
- United States
- November 9, 2012
But another topic not on the agenda may loom just as large for a hierarchy hoping to wield influence in the public square. In September, Bishop Robert Finn of Missouri became the first bishop to be found guilty of covering up for a priest suspected of child abuse.
Unlike President Barack Obamaâ€™s election, however, Finnâ€™s status isnâ€™t a subject the churchmen are eager to discuss.
The verdict against Finn, leader of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph and an outspoken conservative, initially prompted widespread calls for his resignation,Â a Vatican suspension or discipline from his fellow bishops.
Yet in the two months since Finnâ€™s conviction no bishop or church authority has addressed his case, nor has anyone spoken to Finn privately, according to Jack Smith, Finnâ€™s spokesman.
â€śBishop Finn will be attending the USCCB meeting, as he has been fulfilling all of his responsibilities as Bishop of Kansas City-St. Joseph,â€ť Smith wrote in an email. â€śBishop Finn and the Diocese, through its Office of Child and Youth Protection, are actively engaged in fulfilling the terms of probation.â€ť
Smith added that Finn did not intend to address the bishops either in their public or closed-door sessions. USCCB officials also said there were no plans by conference leaders to raise the issue of Finnâ€™s status.
By remaining silent on the issue, critics say the bishops are not only undermining their own policies â€“ Finn heads a diocese yet would not be allowed to teach Sunday school in an American parish under the USCCBâ€™s rules â€“ but they are undermining their credibility and their claims to have learned from the devastating scandal.
â€śNothing has changed over the past 10 years,â€ť said Anne Burke, an Illinois state Supreme Court justice and an original leader of the National Review Board, a blue-ribbon panel of lay Catholics that the USCCB set up in 2002 to hold the bishops accountable.
Burke said the yawning hole in those policies is the lack of any mechanism for disciplining bishops who violate the charter, as the collection of child safety measures is known. While the bishops pledged to â€śapply the requirements of the charter also to ourselves,â€ť they have shown no willingness to do so, she said.
Full Story:Â Convicted bishop is Catholic hierarchyâ€™s elephant in the room
Source: Religion News Service