US lawyers fight to free unionists
Justice sought for activists jailed in in 2010
Mike MacLachlan, London International
October 12, 2012
The firm, Woodley & McGillivary, are working on a pro bono basis in consultation with the US-based group Freedom Now.
Its petition to the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention seeks a ruling that the detention of Doan Huy Chuong, Do Thi Minh Hanh and Nguyen Hoang Quoc is “arbitrary and a violation of international law.”
The three were arrested in January 2010 after they organised a strike at the My Phong shoe factory in Tra Vinh province, southern Vietnam.
According to a Freedom Now statement yesterday, the detainees were held in solitary confinement without charge for eight months before being charged with “threatening national security.”
At their trial they were not allowed legal counsel or the opportunity to speak in their own defense, Freedom Now said. Doan and Do were jailed for seven years and Nguyen for nine.
Freedom Now claims they have been repeatedly beaten and forced to endure hard labor.
“By imprisoning Doan, Do and Nguyen in response to their legitimate activities as union organizers, the Vietnamese government continues to violate their fundamental rights,” said Maran Turner, Freedom Now’s executive director, in a statement yesterday.
“We call on the government to immediately and unconditionally release them and cease its persecution of independent trade unionists.”
Independent unions are outlawed in Vietnam. Instead, all unions must be registered and affiliated with the Community Party-controlled Vietnam General Confederation of Labor, according to Human Rights Watch.
EU and US condemn blogger verdict
'It might sound unusual to talk about caste as being part of the church but it is the truth of our context'
Chinese security agency created to oversee the persecution of Falun Gong group is among those to be inspected
Filipinos mark 150 years since Redemptorist priests became custodians of Our Lady of Perpetual Succour icon
Myanmar's new term 'Muslims in Rakhine State' is debated and seen as controversial
State government rejects call for prohibition saying consumption is a 'matter of choice'