UCAN needs your support
You are why we do what we do - report, describe, comment, review. It is to bring to your eyes just what life is like for believers across Asia that we publish UCAN.
But as you know, the effort needs to be sustained if it is to have continuing effect.
UCAN publishes some 150 stories a week in four languages across six websites. We are grateful to benefactors in Europe and the US who support us. But those countries and the Church there are under increasing financial strain and their generosity no longer covers our costs.
We need financial help from our readers to sustain our efforts. Our reporters, editors, video producers and photographers all have families and we need to support them. They do excellent jobs, but they can't do their jobs for nothing.
Will you help us to sustain UCAN? Please click here to help.
Thanks in anticipation.
Fr. Michael Kelly SJ
The politics of faith in the China Church
The pope's 2007 letter brought turmoil but also inspired hope
- Fr Huabei, Beijing
- June 5, 2012
Rumors had spread across China for months before the papal letter was released on June 30 of that year. During these months, fear and worry filled the minds of those who held power in their hands but had no God in their hearts.
The letter was blocked just hours after it was made available on the internet. In the following months, it was spoken of only in whispers.
Since the majority of Chinese Catholics were notĀ online then, they could not read the letter immediately. The blockage further limited its circulation.
The tension that the letter brought to the China Church was no less than what was produced by the canonization of 120 Chinese martyr-saints on October 1, 2000, Chinaās National Day, after which China-Vatican relations turned sour.
Government officials often came to priests with a pile of papers and asked: āHave you read the popeās letter?ā When they were sure we had not read it, they scanned the paper and recited a paragraph to us to āproclaimā how successful their control was.
Some courageous priests publicized the letter in their parishes. They copied and posted it whenever the copies were peeled off walls. Amid this climate ofĀ fear and intimidation, these clergymen who promoted the letter did not receive any warning or punishment.
But the tense atmosphere scared most of the other bishops and priests, who adopted a passive attitude to the letter to avoid incurring unnecessary trouble. Such mentality greatly reduced the impact of the document.
I did not see many Catholics study the letter in an organized, careful and systematic manner, except for a few individuals who posted their study notes online.
I was also not aware of any bishop who genuinely carried out the letterās spirit among his clergy. A few prelates wrote pastoral letters but few of these documents taught the gist of the popeās letter. Other bishops were either struggling to manage Church affairs amid difficulties or continuing to feel helpless.
Only two types of people really concerned themselves with the letter: the āundergroundā Catholics, as the pope revoked all faculties that were granted to address pastoral necessities in difficult times in the past decades; and personnel from the Catholic Patriotic Association (CPA), as the pope declared its purpose of promoting an independent Church was incompatible with Catholic doctrine.
The letter threatened the legitimacy of their existence.
As Catholic blogger āShanyulaiā said: āThe official community is overshadowed by the fact that the CPA āis incompatible with Catholic doctrineā while the underground community has the nightmare of being sacrificed for the diplomatic ties between China and the Vatican.ā
Therefore, approaching the letter with a distorted mentality induced ill effects, and a number of underground Catholics thought it spelled their doom.
On the contrary, the CPA is very smart and knows it must press gang more bishops and priests to work in it to maintain its survival.
It achieved āgreat eventsā cautiously in recent years. It celebrated the 50th anniversaries of its founding and of āself-election and self-ordinationā of bishops in 2007 and 2008 respectively. It organized 10 decent episcopal ordinations in 2010 but ended the year with an illicit one and convened the National Congress of Catholic Representatives. In 2011, another two illicit ordinations took place.
After utilizing the bishops, it played with the slogan of āevangelizationā to safeguard its status, further increasing the āworriesā that Pope Benedict mentioned in his letter.
While politics continues to harass our faith, I would like to reiterate that the pope has no thought of waging war, playing games or hatching plots, but merely his benevolence and Godās love.
The Catholic faith only cares about justice, peace, repentance and the renewal of humanity. The government should abandon the colonial thinking that everyone is bullying China. We should not deny that foreign missionaries spread their charity and sacrificed their lives in China.
Today we must re-read the popeās letter and understand that its purpose is not to ādeal with every detail of the complex mattersā but āto offer some guidelines concerning the life of the Church and the task of evangelization in China.ā
We must reject any voice that attempts to confuse or blur this purpose.
Fr Huabei is the pseudonym of a priest in northern China
Papal letter to China Church bears fruit
Rome, how must we express our faith?
The missing young bishop of Shanghai