UCAN needs your support
You are why we do what we do - report, describe, comment, review. It is to bring to your eyes just what life is like for believers across Asia that we publish UCAN.
But as you know, the effort needs to be sustained if it is to have continuing effect.
UCAN publishes some 150 stories a week in four languages across six websites. We are grateful to benefactors in Europe and the US who support us. But those countries and the Church there are under increasing financial strain and their generosity no longer covers our costs.
We need financial help from our readers to sustain our efforts. Our reporters, editors, video producers and photographers all have families and we need to support them. They do excellent jobs, but they can't do their jobs for nothing.
Will you help us to sustain UCAN? Please click here to help.
Thanks in anticipation.
Fr. Michael Kelly SJ
Hail of criticism for pro-poor Food Bill
Opposition to proposed law from all quartersThe Food Bill aims to enable more than half the population to buy subsidized grains
- Swati Deb, New Delhi
- January 21, 2013
Government efforts to bring in legislation that would secure staple food supplies for India’s poor has met with skepticism across the board, from local state governments, political parties and analysts.
The Indian parliament aims to enshrine the proposed Food Bill as law by the end of March. It would entitle about 67 percent of the population to get grains at subsidized rates.
An estimated 820 million beneficiaries would be able to buy rice, wheat and millet at prices as low as one rupee per kg.
One of the numerous objectors, communist party member TN Seema, believes the entitlements do not go far enough.
“The bill should be universal in nature with no caps artificially decided,” he told ucanews.com.
"Creating artificial barriers of 75 percent beneficiaries in rural areas and 50 percent beneficiaries in urban pockets undermines the fundamental concept of food security."
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) and other leftist parties have also dismissed the bill in its present form. Crucially, the socialist Samajwadi Party, which extends support to the federal government and whose opinion could be vital in passing the bill, has added to the criticism.
On a local level, a number of state governments including Tamil Nadu and West Bengal have attacked it for adding unnecessarily to their burdens.
“The bill only outlines the states’ responsibilities, without giving them adequate options to tap revenues,” said S Adhikari of West Bengal's Trinamool (Grassroots) Congress.
He told ucanews.com that his party’s government in the state already faces financial crisis.
“The federal government's motives for bringing in such a bill are political,” he said.
Accusations of political opportunism have been echoed by several others.
NGO activist Himanshu Kumar said the bill has been guided by populism.
“The food security will only be on paper and for politicians,” he said. “The bill does not seek to reduce imbalances in the hunger and nutrition situation in different parts of the country."