• China Flag
  • India Flag
  • Indonesia Flag
  • Philippines Flag
  • Vietnam Flag

Celebrating history's most famous Catholic rebel

On November 5, thousands of bonfires are lit in memory of Guy Fawkes

<p>Picture: <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-169246p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Rob Kints</a>/<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a></p>

Picture: Rob Kints/Shutterstock.com

  • Brantly Millegan for Aleteia
  • United Kingdom
  • November 6, 2013
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Mail
  • Share

Happy Gunpowder Treason Day! Or Guy Fawkes Day, depending on your politics. Both are remembrances of the failed “Gunpowder Plot” of a group of Catholics to blow up the House of Lords in London in response to severe persecution against Catholics by the government. Tipped off by an anonymous letter, police discovered Guy Fawkes guarding the explosives just hours before the attack.

Ever since, Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators have been lionized and demonized, celebrated as martyrs and held up as an examples of why Catholics cannot be trusted. The 2005 movie V for Vendettaremade the Guy Fawkes legend for our own time, and groups likeAnonymous have take up his image as a symbol of courageous, principled opposition to tyranny. But is he really a hero?

“The Gunpowder Plot needs to be seen and understood within the framework of its historical context,” says Joseph Pearce, Writer-in-Residence and Professor of Humanities at Thomas More College. “The persecuted and besieged Catholics of England had waited doggedly and hopefully for the death of the aging Queen in the hope and expectation that her successor, James I, would fulfill his promise to end the relentless attacks on Catholicism.”

“Although James was married to a Catholic he reneged on his promise and continued with the same policy of torturing priests and putting them to death. The brief euphoria that surrounded the death of Bloody Bess in 1603 was followed by a feeling of despair as England's Catholics realized that there was no foreseeable end to the terror under which they lived. For some, this despair led to the desperation of the now infamous plot to assassinate the King and his ministers.”

Pearce says the hardship of the time was reflected in some of the works of Shakespeare - who himself may have been Catholic. “Those wishing to gain a real sense of the darkness that descended on England's Catholics in this grim hour in England's history need look no further than the darkness of the plots of MacbethKing Lear andOthello, each of which convey that anger and despondency of the Catholic Shakespeare at this time.”

Despite the grave persecution Catholics in England were suffering at the time, Catholic author John Zmirak says the plot was immoral. “[T]his was not an act of Just War. Why? It had no chance of success. There was no Catholic heir waiting in Scotland with an army to back him up. There was no realistic plan to reestablish order.” 

Zmirak points out that the plot actually worsened the English persecution of Catholics. “It was just an act of vindictive, nihilistic violence--which led to a predictable, vicious persecution of Catholics. For the same reason, using violence against abortionists is wrong: it's an act of civil war. And we would lose.”

Full Story: The Most Famous Catholic Terrorist in History

Source: Aleteia

  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Mail
  • Share
UCAN India Books Online