Activists attack Fonseka verdict
'Judicial reform needed' after top general jailed for three years
ucanews.com reporters, Colombo
November 21, 2011
General Sarath Fonseka, who is already serving a 30-month term for irregularities in military procurement, was jailed for having “spread disaffection” by backing, in a newspaper interview, allegations that the defense minister ordered the shooting of Tamil Tiger rebels who were trying to surrender.
The secretary to the defense minister was Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, the president's brother.
Following the court case, a meeting of activists including religious leaders, journalists and lawyers, said the trial was politically motivated and called for judicial reform.
“There is no transparency in the judicial system today and people should call for the independence of the judiciary,” said Venerable Maduluwawe Sobitha Thero, a leading Buddhist monk.
“We urge the authorities to respect the judiciary,” he said.
“I saw people rushing out of the court and expressing their anguish and anger at the judiciary. It was the first time in my 24-year career as a lawyer,” said J.C. Weliamuna, former executive director of Transparency International.
Fonseka, who says he was quoted out of context, refused to accept this verdict, saying the conviction was a political one aimed at keeping him out of politics.
The main opposition party said the verdict was a clear indication that law, order and democracy did not prevail in the country.
Groups decry website ‘censorship’
Sri Lankan religious leaders want Sarath Fonseka’s release
Bishops appeal for Fonseka’s release
How a young Vietnamese woman who was sold into sex work in China recovered her dignity and rebuilt her life
Decision entitles community in Maharashtra to reap benefits of quota system
Marites Flor, a Filipino woman, was kidnapped with two Canadians and a Norwegian in September
Vatican spokesman treads lightly in response to events occurring inside China
Villagers in Bago Division destroyed parts of a mosque, a madrassa and some houses following an argument