UCAN needs your support
You are why we do what we do - report, describe, comment, review. It is to bring to your eyes just what life is like for believers across Asia that we publish UCAN.
But as you know, the effort needs to be sustained if it is to have continuing effect.
UCAN publishes some 150 stories a week in four languages across six websites. We are grateful to benefactors in Europe and the US who support us. But those countries and the Church there are under increasing financial strain and their generosity no longer covers our costs.
We need financial help from our readers to sustain our efforts. Our reporters, editors, video producers and photographers all have families and we need to support them. They do excellent jobs, but they can't do their jobs for nothing.
Will you help us to sustain UCAN? Please click here to help.
Thanks in anticipation.
Fr. Michael Kelly SJ
Abuse scandal has cost US Church $2.74 billion since 2004
Some dioceses criticized for not contributing to USCCB report
- United States
- April 1, 2014
The clerical abuse scandal cost American dioceses $108,954,109 in 2013, according to a report released on March 28 by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).
Only 62% of those funds were allotted to settlements ($61.1 million) and therapy for abuse victims ($6.1 million). The remaining funds were spent on attorneys’ fees ($28.9 million), support for offenders ($10.4 million), and other costs ($2.4 million), according to the 2013 “Report on the Implementation of the Charter for Protection of Children and Young People.”
The clerical abuse scandal cost religious institutes an additional $14,411,168 in 2013. These expenses brought the total cost of the clerical abuse scandal to American dioceses and religious institutes between 2004 and 2012 to $2,744,881,843: $2,351,903,157 for dioceses and eparchies, and $392,978,686 for religious institutes.
The report added that dioceses, eparchies, and religious orders spent $41,721,675 for child protection efforts in 2013.
During the 2013 audit period, “370 new credible allegations of sexual abuse of a minor” were lodged by 365 persons-- nine of them minors, the rest of them adults who said they were abused when they were minors. “These allegations were made by 365 individuals against 290 priests or deacons,” the report stated. 56% of them “had already been identified in prior allegations,” and 73% “are deceased, already removed from ministry, already laicized, or missing.”
80% of those who alleged abuse were male, and abuse typically took place between the ages of 10 and 14. Most of the allegations involved incidents that took place between 1960 and 1989, particularly the 1970s.
50% of all recent allegations could not be proven, while 14% were classified as "substantiated" and 8% have been found to be unsubstantiated; in other cases, the investigation is ongoing.
On the other hand, the majority (53%) of allegations recently made by minors have been found to be unsubstantiated, while 18% have been substantiated.
The authors of the report criticized the Diocese of Lincoln and three Eastern Catholic eparchies for not taking part in an audit that measures compliance with the USCCB’s 2002 Dallas charter. The eparchies are the Chaldean Eparchy of Saint Peter the Apostle of San Diego, the Eparchy of Our Lady of Nareg in New York for Armenian Catholics, and the Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Stamford.
StoneBridge Business Partners, which conducted the audit, noted that “most dioceses and all eparchies opted not to have StoneBridge conduct parish audits. Some dioceses countered that they perform their own audits and elected to opt out of having StoneBridge also audit them.”
“Parishes and schools represent the front lines in any diocese’s or eparchy’s Charter compliance efforts,” the auditor added. “If a diocese or eparchy does not conduct some form of audit of its parishes and schools-- whether by diocesan/eparchial representative or external auditor such as StoneBridge-- the bishop or eparch cannot be sure that Charter-related policies and procedures are clearly communicated and effectively carried out.”