UCAN needs your support
You are why we do what we do - report, describe, comment, review. It is to bring to your eyes just what life is like for believers across Asia that we publish UCAN.
But as you know, the effort needs to be sustained if it is to have continuing effect.
UCAN publishes some 150 stories a week in four languages across six websites. We are grateful to benefactors in Europe and the US who support us. But those countries and the Church there are under increasing financial strain and their generosity no longer covers our costs.
We need financial help from our readers to sustain our efforts. Our reporters, editors, video producers and photographers all have families and we need to support them. They do excellent jobs, but they can't do their jobs for nothing.
Will you help us to sustain UCAN? Please click here to help.
Thanks in anticipation.
Fr. Michael Kelly SJ
A closer look at Pope Francis' airborne engagement with the press
One priest sees it as indicative of his message that the 'Church must go out to the world'
- Ezra Klein
- August 1, 2013
Much is being made of Pope Francis’s rare, 80-minute, 21-question impromptu airborne news conference during his return from World Youth Day in Brazil. Caution would dictate reading too much into the remarks so far reported, not least because no complete transcript of the conversation is yet available in English.
But the very fact of the free-wheeling exchange, and the nature of some of the remarks permits at least some responsible comment and speculation.
To begin with, the Holy Father’s decision to make himself available to such open questioning is emblematic of a theme he has repeated early and often in his papacy: the Church must go out to the world.
A bit of historical context may be helpful. When Blessed John Paul II was elevated to the papacy, he observed a Church going through a good deal of turmoil after the roiling changes within the Church wrought by the Second Vatican Council, and the cultural ferment that had characterized the previous decade and a half in the West.
The “conservatism” of his pontificate, such as it was, consisted in emphasizing that the Council had not abandoned orthodoxy as to doctrine and in battling the relativism of secular culture. That project seemed at least in part to shield Catholicism from the doctrinal drift that arguably characterized mainline Protestant churches over the same period.
In this sense, there was a strong inward-looking emphasis of the pontificate of John Paul II, however much his globe-trotting evangelization and outgoing personality were also hallmarks of his time as the Bishop of Rome.
When he was succeeded by the scholarly Benedict XVI, the inward looking project and the battle with relativism continued, and it was led now by a quieter, more introverted personality. (And of course, all of this is painting with broad brush strokes—Benedict XVI traveled widely, and his visit to the USA, which I had the privilege to witness personally on the South Lawn and at National Park, was triumphant.) The two pontificates combined amounted to some 34 years of a project of consolidation and stabilization.
It is little wonder then that Pope Francis’s style and substance reflect his sense that it is time once again for the Church to resume the outward focus that has always been its reason for existence: to bring Christ to the world. That greater outward focus is better seen as a tribute to his predecessors than as a repudiation of them; Francis’s confidence is confidence about the Catholic Church, its traditions, doctrines, and modes of evangelization, as they have been preserved and handed on. Necessarily, then, his expressions of gratitude to Benedict XVI have the ring of sincerity, even as Francis’s own style and emphases are different.
But what of his reported remarks concerning homosexuals, that, “[i]f they accept the Lord and have goodwill, who am I to judge them?” It would be vastly premature to interpret this as an opening toward a revision of the Church’s understanding that natural law forbids sexual activity outside of heterosexual marriage, not least as they were made, it seems, in reference to a questions about power blocs in the Vatican and the existence of a “gay lobby.” Indeed, the remarks went on to reject lobbying “for an orientation.”
But it would be a mistake not to see in the tone of Pope Francis’s pastoral, a welcoming approach that begins with the mercy of God and invites a dialogue with the other. And in an era marked by what the distinguished philosopher Charles Taylor has termed “soft relativism,” in which “vigorous defense of any moral ideal is somehow off limits,” we do well to recall that mercy only makes sense against a horizon of better and worse choices, of virtue and vice, indeed of sin. So Pope Francis, in affirming the mercy of God as the starting point of our dialogue, likewise affirms that not all actions are equally virtuous and calls us all to be mindful of our own sin.
Source: Washington Post Wonkblog