|
Gospel-Based Communities Becoming Agents of change |
|
I. How to Maintain Small
Christian Communities, or Basic
Ecclesial Communities, by Cora Mateo II. The Basic Ecclesial Communities as a Church Model for Asia, by Archbishop Orlando B. Quevedo |
|
|
I.
How To Maintain Small Christian Communities,
Or
Basic Ecclesial Communities
By
Cora Mateo
Introduction
The Seventh
Plenary Assembly of the FABC is calling us to have a closer look at traces
of a renewed Church in Asia and to search, as disciples of Jesus called
to a Mission of Love and Service, for relevant responses for the new century.
The past
three decades saw the emergence in Asia of a grassroots movement called
"Basic Ecclesial Communities/Small Christian Communities." BECs/SCCs have
been hailed as a new hope for renewal in church and society -- "the most
fundamental ecclesial realities," as stated by the Asian bishops.[1]Pope
John Paul 11 has called them "signs of vitality within the church, an instrument
of formation and evangelization, and a solid starting point for a new society
based on a civilization of love," [2]since
they give possibility for all the baptized to participate in church life
and mission in their own areas.
A survey
about BECs/SCCs in different parts of Asia conducted by the AsIPA Desk
of the FABC Office of Laity bears witness to the vision of the "New Way
of Being Church" that was at the heart of the Final Statement of the Plenary
Assembly of the Fifth Plenary Assembly in Bandung. [3]
Asked
about the changes in the life of the parish because of efforts to have
BECs/SCCs, a lot of positive remarks were made. Let us listen to some voices:
"People have started to use the Bible" (Sri Lanka).
"They listen to the Word of God more carefully" (Myanmar).
"The Word of God has become dear and meaningful to them; they have started to pray spontaneously" (India).
"Participation of the people in liturgy and in other church matters have increased" (Bangladesh).
"They take more responsibility as members of the parish" (Indonesia).
"There is more concern for each other as members of the same community, especially in times of sorrow, e.g. death" (Malaysia).
"There is unity, cooperation and concern for others" (Philippines).
"The SCCs have common tasks in the neighborhood, e.g., repair houses, clean roads, buildings" (Sri Lanka).
"Some BECs are involved in interreligious and interracial movements. Their members are more approachable and willing to share and to open their houses" (Malaysia).
A. BECs/SCCs
-- Living Cells Of A Church Dedicated To 'Service To Life'
FABC VI's
Final Statement called for a "disciple-community," that "is living by the
Spirit of the Risen Lord and by the demands of the Kingdom of Life[4]and
is a "liberating and recreating communion among neighbors."
[5]
Many
of the BECs/SCCs in Asia show the characteristics of a true "disciple-community"
in as far as:
a. They come together as a group of neighbors who have the same concerns for daily life and look for solutions in the light of faith.In the survey all of the group felt called "to share their faith, build up community and take actions towards local needs" the basic purpose of their BECs/SCCs.
b. They make Gospel Sharing the basis of their regular meetings.
c. They act together out of faith, and are therefore a concrete expression of the Church.
d. They are linked to a parish and take part in the worship and ministries.[6]
B. Major Difficulties Of BECs/SCCs -- Some Solutions
Although there is a variety of BECs/SCCs throughout Asia, there are common areas of concern. Here are some statements of people involved in BECs/SCCs:
"When the animator moved to a different parish the community stopped gathering."
"A lot of people stay away from leadership or any involvement -- they are not used to assuming responsibilities in the church."
"There is very poor cooperation with the priest and the religious in our neighborhood parish -- there is no big enthusiasm in our diocese."
"Some of the SCCs in our parish are more like prayer groups. They show no interest in social issues or social involvement."
1. Different Ways of Starting BECs/SCCs
The question of how to maintain BECs/SCCs is closely related to the question how BECs/SCCs came into being. [9] There are many ways of starting SCCs, e.g., developing existing prayer groups, or action committees. But experience has shown, however, that certain ways will necessarily lead to failure. Two main approaches have to be distinguished:
i. "Expert" StartPositive aspects of the "expert" start are the quick start and short time needed to train leaders. The negative aspects are linked to the impression that the SCCs are "Father's business." Inner conviction and lasting commitment will hardly be developed, leaders may not be accepted by the community, and some of them may not be suitable for the task of promoting SCCs.
ii. "Community" Start
2. How to Involve the Whole Community: The Importance of Awareness Programs
If a three-legged chair is to be made lower or higher, one cannot just alter one or two legs but has to change all three. If a congregation wants to become a sharing and caring community, then the three parts have to undergo a change:
3. Developing Shared Ministry
A
difficulty for many parishes and BECs/SCCs is how to get the right leaders
for SCCs, or how to replace them. This question is closely related to the
awareness of a shared ministry in the Church. The awareness that all members
of the Christian community are called to share with others in prayer, service
and community building cannot be forced on them. It has to emerge from
within the community as the result of a participatory process.
There
are different ways of getting leaders, some of them foster this process,
some of them don't.
The AsIPA process proposes a fourth way of getting leaders for SCCs: "The emerging, rotating team leadership." [11]
Explanation: How Leaders Emerged in the SCC "St. Gabriel."
The whole
community is aware of their responsibility to do Gospel-sharing and visit
newcomers. Out of this common awareness of shared leadership, new leaders
emerge and act on behalf of the small community. Although these leaders
are elected, they "emerge" from an atmosphere in which all feel: "It is
our common business!"
The small
community knows exactly for what task particular leaders are needed. This
makes it easier to let the right people emerge. There are at least two
leaders chosen for each task in the community, to avoid overburdening one
person, and to make mutual correction easier. Other advantages of teamwork
are: it's easier to replace somebody; young people can join more easily;
shy characters will find it easier to come forward; and the burden of training
will be shared.
A rotating
leadership animates all the members of the SCC to take an active part in
the tasks of the community. It helps to develop the gifts and talents of
every member. "Old" leaders can share their wisdom with the new leaders.
People undertake more willingly a certain responsibility if the time of
their commitment is limited. The SCC coordinator (or facilitator), for
example, will usually change after two years. Concrete tasks, like greeting
newcomers in the neighborhood, could even rotate after six months.
To have
an "emerging, rotating team leadership" calls for a constant ongoing training
in the BECs/SCCs. A participatory process is suggested to find out what
kind of formation is needed for various leaders of BECs/ SCCs.
The AsIPA
Desk of the FABC Office of Laity and the Lumko Institute offer a whole
series of skills-training and formation programs for leaders of BECs/SCCs.
Most of them are based on the principle of "learning by doing."
Pastoral
planning in every parish should include in its parish calendar terms for
skills-training and the spiritual formation of leaders during a particular
period every year. It is the task of the parish priest and his parish team
to invite the leaders to weekend retreats and formation programs.
An annual
"Blessing of Community Leaders" will keep the interest in BECs/SCCs alive,
and give public recognition to their contribution to the life of the parish.
The annual
celebration for the parish leaders should be celebrated on a special Sunday
of the year where all leaders of the parish can be thanked, introduced
to their responsibilities, or released from them.
The AsIPA
process considers helping the SCCs sustain and maintain themselves to be
a very important principle for "maintaining SCCs."
[12] To strengthen the self-confidence and
conviction of all the members of a SCC, an ongoing formation of all members
is indispensable. The AsIPA texts have been written for this purpose. A
facilitator of SCCs, without the traditional theological schooling, can
use the AsIPA texts in their respective groups after a minimum of training.
The texts focus not only on some 11 skills," but try to share with the
lay-faithful deeper theological insights about the "New Way of Being Church."
This might be the major challenge not only for the members of the SCCs
and their leaders, but also for the full-time leaders (bishops, priests,
deacons, catechists, etc.), and for the whole congregation, as they are
called to a change their attitudes and to evaluate their specific role
in the Church.
In the
"New Way of Being Church" the clergy and laity continue to have different
roles, but there is "true equality between all with regard to the dignity
and to the activity which is in common to all the faithful." [13]
There are no classes of the "learned" and the "ignorant." All have some
knowledge and experience to share.
"Maintaining
SCCs" depends greatly on whether the parish priest and the parish leaders
accept and appreciate this equality, and how they understand the nature
and mission of the SCCs. This will influence the way in which the priest
and his team will inspire and accompany the SCCs in the parish.
SCCs
are more than prayer and/or action groups. They are the "concrete expression
of Church." [14]
SCCs, therefore, share in the basic mission of the parish in their particular
neighborhood and make it possible to "de-centralize" the tasks of the parish.
The members of the SCCs share in the consultative and decision-making process
of their parish. Pastoral tasks will no longer be limited to members of
existing organizations and committees. Associations and other traditional
groups in the parish are challenged by the SCCs to re-think their role
within the Christian community.
4. Towards a Guiding Leadership
In a paper written for a training session for new bishops, Archbishop Joseph Ti Kang writes. [15]
Here is a brief exercise to reflect on our own leadership style:
Read silently the features of leadership as presented in the these two columns, and try to see the difference of leadership style when the pastor says: "I am the Church, " and when he is convinced and says: "WE are the Church:"
| I
am the Church
"I must provide for them!"
|
WE
are the Church
"I want to build up people!"
"I respect the people." |
Some of the difficulties found in SCCs are tensions between the parish priest and the SCCs, or between members of SCCs and their coordinators. Many of them are caused by a dominating leadership style.
Let us have a look at a parish with this problem: [16]
The congregation
of St. Simon with about one thousand Catholics had already gone through
the different stages of building up a community of communities, when the
problem arose that some leaders wished to do things alone. Again and again,
the community had to counter these attempts. Many people emphasized that
they wanted everybody to have a say, and every-body to use their charisms.
But others said that they found it good if leaders had special rights and
were different from the others.
One day,
somebody stood up in one of these meetings, and said: "Do you not see that
this is the main problem of our whole society, not only of the Church?
We have officials in the town-offices who want to become our bosses instead
of serving us. We have leaders who compete among themselves for power and
status instead of working for the common good of the country. And, at the
same time, we have the masses of people who just accept the evil and have
given up their right to say what they feel. They leave everything to the
few at the top. They deplore the domination but they assist it through
their passivity. They suffer under the exploitation, but they perpetuate
it forever, because they are competing in the very same way among themselves.
It is a vicious circle of domination and submission and it will carry on
forever, unless somebody finds something that counteracts it.
Do you
not see that it is God himself who is most strongly against this kind of
life? Do you not see that it must therefore be the family of God, the Church,
who has to make a path towards a new kind of society where there is communal
responsibility? What we need is a combination of real community and non-dominating
leadership. We want this kind of leadership everywhere: in the town-offices,
in the factories, in the political parties, and in the governments of our
countries.
But if
we want it in the whole society, we must make a start in the Church. If
we cannot manage it in the Church, we cannot make big statements saying
that it is God's will in the world. In the Church we are a large group
of people. We have to demonstrate in the Church, that it is possible for
such a large group to feel belonging to each other, to voice their opinion,
and to be jointly responsible. At the same time we must demonstrate that
such a large group can have leaders who exercise authority without destroying
communal responsibility. If we believe that society needs non-dominating
leadership, we must prove in the Church that this is possible. This is
our service to the world.
A Christian
community needs leaders who resemble Jesus Christ: Jesus led and served
at the same time. He rejected Satan's temptation to power and made himself
equal to his disciples.
One Gospel
passage[17]
gives us an excellent summary of a good leader according to the ways of
Christ:
Jesus
walked with the disciples to Emmaus; listened to their reasons for being
sad; helped them discover the message, while retelling the Scriptures and
inflaming their hearts; accepted their invitation to stay and share at
table; be recognized in the breaking of the bread; and disappeared when
not needed.
According to the Gospel the features of a guiding leadership are:
In a Participatory Church there is always a team of leaders working with the parish priest.a good leader helps others how to find out what is wrong with themselves a good leader offers a vision a good leader is a non-dominating leader, who is patient and gives the members of the group the feeling, that everyone can contribute to the solution a good leader is with the people; his role is guiding, facilitating the group response a good leader builds up people, gives confidence to them a good leader encourages others to do the same a good leader is an inspiring leader.
5. Ongoing Formation for Facilitators
A
difficulty of BECs/SCCs, sometimes mentioned, is that they are rather a
nice prayer group, and show no or very little interest in social actions.
This is quite often related to the fact that there was no, or poor, basic
formation of new leaders. In most of the cases there was very little ongoing
formation.
The AsIPA
modules are prepared in such a way that they lead to action. The basic
steps of this awareness program are:
It is crucial for every BEC/SCC to know the basic structure of a SCC-meeting, which follows the 7 Step-Gospel-Sharing Method:Look at the life-situation Seek inspiration from the word of God and from Church teachings, and, Plan a common action to move towards the vision.
When BECs/SCCs have been using the 7-Steps Method for some years, one way to maintain them is to help them grow in their social awareness and concern. There are other group-sharing methods that concretely aim at this.Step 1-5: Growing personally and together as a community in the presence of Christ. Step 6-7: Continuing Christ's mission in this particular neighborhood. [18]
Group Response Method
[19]
: facing Sunday Gospel's social aspects.
Aims:
Look-Listen-LoveTo see how daily situations and problems are reflected in the biblical text. To help the group look beyond their immediate personal spiritual needs. To make the Gospel a driving force for "self-help" in tackling life issues.
To start from a life-issue. To share life-experiences in which members of the group are emotionally involved, feeling happy or unhappy about them. To listen to God's call regarding this experience or event, even if no biblical text can be quoted. To arrive at common action.
C. BECs/SCCs
As Agents Of Change:
From Gospel Sharing
to Social Involvement
BECs/SCCs
do not live for themselves alone but to become communities that carry out
the Kingdom mission of justice and peace in the world. It is not right
for Christians to leave "social analysis" to experts only, or to some militant
political groups. It was for this reason that different programs have been
compiled to empower BECs/SCCs and other groups to get involved in social
issues.
An outstanding
tool to move from Gospel sharing to social involvement is the Amos Program.
1. Amos Program : Its Aim and Features
The Aim
of the Amos Program:
Amos
was a prophet of Israel. He was one of the people who herded the cattle
and ploughed the field. Inspired by God's Spirit he stood up against the
king and the priests of his time. He told them that God wants laws that
are just, and religious services which come from pure hearts.
In the
same way, the Amos programs aim at waking up Christian communities, and
helping them to do something about the problems that are tormenting them.
Too often Christian communities say: "We are powerless; we cannot do anything;
we just sit down and wait." The Amos programs help to overcome this mentality.
They offer a way of facing social or economic problems, analyzing them
in the light of the Gospel and doing something about them.
The main features of the Amos Program:
The Amos Programs are used from time to time, to widen the dimension of a group's Christian vision and enable them to take part in changing the world around them.The starting point is a "typical" social, economic or political problem, e.g., "When the poor are pushed aside." There are two "rounds" of analysis in the Amos Program:
First, a somewhat "superficial" analysis, asking the question "WHY?"
Secondly, a deeper analysis, searching for the root causes of a problem.A problem-solving scheme helps the group to arrive at a concrete action. "God's point of view" is included through Gospel Sharing and asking the Church documents what they have to say about a certain problem.
2. Example of an Amos Program: "We Need More than Money." [20]
1. Look at Life: The Story
of Florence, the Bride
There
was great excitement in the home of Florence. Mr. Lola was dating Florence
and there was hope that he wanted to marry her. The girl, however, was
not in a hurry to decide.
Her father
was furious. He could not understand his daughter's hesitation. "Look,"
he said. "Mr. Lola is one of the richest businessmen in town. He knows
how to make money and he is not lazy. Even on Sunday morning he works in
his office. On Sunday afternoon he looks after the local soccer team. He
is a respected man. Do not miss the greatest chance in your life. Who else
in town drives such a car as he does? Who else could build such a beautiful
house for himself? If you want to be happy, marry him. He will be able
to fulfil all your wishes and buy you all you want. What else are you looking
for in life?"
Florence
just replied: "Dad, I need more than money." Her father shook his head
and left in anger.
(Read
the story twice. Dramatize the conversation between Florence and her father.)
2. Ask the question Why?
(Buzz sessions in groups of two, 2 to 4 minutes: report back to the whole
group after each question.)
God is interested in Florence's happiness and in our own happiness. His word can throw light on her situation.
b) We listen in silence:
Read the text again, slowly.
Keep silence.
Or: Pick out a word or a
short phrase. Keep silence after each individual contribution.
c) We can share together:
What word or phrase has
touched you personally? (No discussion yet.)
d) We search together:
What has this text to do
with Florence?
How does this text challenge
our own life?
Let us find deeper reasons why many of us think that the only thing which can make us happy is money.
b) What do Church documents
say about our question?
The world,
people around us, our youth... are confused about real happiness. We Christians
have the prophetic task to proclaim the Good News, news which can make
people happy.
How can
you, as a community, bring to others a happiness that cannot be bought
with money? What can you do to help the youth find the way to those real
values which alone can bring happiness?
Make
a plan, even if you can do very little yet. Make use of the following steps
to agree on a concrete plan of action:
Conclusion
The lay
faithful of the Church have demonstrated their desire to participate fully
in the life of the Church and its mission in the world. In several occasions
and in previous statements, the Asian Bishops have recognized the importance
of enabling the whole People of God to become a sign of communion and to
live out their faith in daily circumstances.
The formation
of Small Christian Communities and the BECs and their growth will bring
to realization the communion and mission so longed for by all. The need
for continuous support, training, evaluation and trust cannot be underestimated.
The work has just begun.
D. Reflection Questions
1. What
is your diocesan vision that gives light and direction to all the efforts
to build BECs/SCCs? How is the vision implemented in all diocesan and parish
programs and activities?
2. What
is the present situation of BECs/SCCs in your diocese? What are some of
the difficulties they encounter? What are some of the approaches they have
employed to expand and maintain the communities?
3. What
are the difficulties you have experienced?
4. List
the advantages and disadvantages of both ways of starting SCCs.
| 1.
'Expert' Start
1) Parish leaders decide:
"We should have SCCs!"
|
2.
"Community' Start
1) Retreat weekends on "New
Way of Being Church" by a small (diocesan) team.
|
Footnotes
[1]
Asian Colloquium on Ministries, 1977.
[2]
Redemptoris Missio, No. 51.
[3]
FABC V, Plenary Assembly, "Final Statement," Bandung, 1990.
[4]
FABC VI, Plenary Assembly, "Final Statement," Manila, 1995, No.
14.1.
[5]
IBID, No. 14.2.
[6]
AsIPA TEXTS, B/3.
[8]
FABC VII, PLENARY Assembly, Bangkok, 2000
[7]
Statement of Bishop Joseph Kingsley Swampillai of Sri Lanka, In
ASIA FOCUS, January 16, 1998, p.8.
[9]
AsIPA TEXTS, D/6.
[10]
Awareness Programs for the Sunday Liturgy: AsIPA TEXTS, D/3,D/4,D/5.
[11]
AsIPA TEXTS, B/4, p. 6-12.
[12]
AsIPA TEXTS, D/7
[13]
Vatican II: LG 32
[14]
AsIPA TEXTS, B/2
[15]
Joseph, Ti Kang, "The Bishops and the Laity," Vatican, October 2,
1995.
[16]
Lobinger, Fritz, Towards Non-Dominating Leadership, No. 10 of Lumko-Series,
p. 9.
[17]
Mk 16:12; Lk24:13.
[18]
AsIPA TEXTS, A/1-A/6.
[19]
AsIPA TEXTS, A/7
[20]
Hirmer, Oswald, The Pastoral Use of the Bible, Gospel Sharing Methods,
No. 20, of Lumko Series, p. 72.
II.
The Basic Ecclesial Community
As
A Church Model For Asia
By
Archbishop Orlando Quevedo
Introduction
My topic
has been the main concern of my pastoral experience, and is close to my
heart: The Basic Ecclesial Community (BEC) as a Church Model.
Strangely,
the BEC is mentioned explicitly in only two instances in the Instrumentum
Laboris of the Special Assembly for Asia of the Synod of bishops for
Asia (as "Basic Christian Community"). Still, in both instances the Instrumentum
Laboris cites BEC as a positive element, and an Asian aspiration for
a genuine sharing and serving disciple-community.
My task
now is relatively simple. It is to treat of the BEC as a Model of the Church
for Asia. I wish to develop the topic in three general steps: (a) the Pastoral
Situation and Vision in Asia; (b) the Vision of a New Way of Being Church;
and (c) Basic Ecclesial Communities.
The Pastoral Situation And Vision In Asia
From the
very beginning of the Federation of Asian Bishops' Conferences (FABC),
three key insights into the pastoral situation have guided pastoral reflection
among FABC bishops. The first is the tragic reality that Asia is the vast
continent of the poor. Almost three-fourths of the world's poor are in
Asia (73% in 1993; South Asia alone has the biggest share of the world's
poor at 39%). While Asia's poor may not be the poorest of the poor (for
it would seem that these live in Sub-Saharan Africa), still rural poverty
is the principal aspect of Asian poverty. On the other hand, mass media
would seem to dwell more on the mass migration of rural poor to urban areas,
and on the dehumanizing situation in which millions of poor Asians live
in hundreds of crowded and crime-ridden city slums.
Faced
with this situation of abysmal poverty the Asian Church envisioned a Church
that is on the side of the poor, exercising a preferential love for the
poor, and proclaiming a Gospel of integral salvation and liberation from
every form of dehumanization, most especially sin. It is a vision of a
Church of the Poor.
A second
key insight into the pastoral situation is the fact that Asia is the cradle
of the world's ancient religions, including Christianity, Islam, Buddhism,
Hinduism, and scores of ancient religious and philosophical traditions.
For centuries, even before Christ, some of these religious and philosophical
beliefs have shaped and enriched Asian civilizations, and through them
Asian peoples have believed in salvation.
In light
of this pastoral reality, the Church in Asia envisions itself as a Church
in dialogue with peoples of other faiths and religions, journeying to the
common hope of all humankind, which is to satisfy the deepest aspirations,
especially spiritual, of the human heart and soul. The Church in Asia has
to be a Church of Dialogue.
The third
key insight into the pastoral situation is the fact that Asia is also the
home of the greatest variety of rich and ancient cultures, the matrix of
great and enduring civilizations. The thought patterns, ways of valuing
and relating, ways of living, and all other elements, that make up the
cultures of Asia are vastly different from those which brought Christianity
into many Asian countries. Although Christianity was born in Asia, in many
parts of this continent Christianity is regarded as a "foreign religion."
In a few countries, becoming Christian may even raise questions of cultural
identity.
From
this insight Asian bishops envisioned the Church to be thoroughly inculturated,
so that Christ, his life and message, the Gospel and the Kingdom of God,
the Church and its teachings, etc., may be fully understood in terms of
the cultures. Through such inculturation, Christ and the Church would truly
have an Asian Face.
The pastoral
situation then calls for a triple dialogue: with the poor, with peoples'
faiths, and with their cultures.
The corresponding
vision is formidable, but daily it is guiding Asian local churches in their
pastoral thrusts and programs.
The Vision Of A New Way Of Being Church
In the
dynamic interplay of pastoral situation and pastoral reflection, there
has emerged in Asia a vision of a "new way of being Church."
One will
find such a vision described in FABC plenary assemblies, in various FABC
institutes and pastoral programs, such as BIRA (Bishops' Institute for
Religious Affairs), BILA (Bishops' Institute for the Lay Apostolate), BIMA
(Bishops' Institute for Missionary Animation), and BISA (Bishops' Institute
for Social Action).
How would
the Asian vision of a new way of being Church be concisely described? To
describe it comprehensively within the time available is not possible.
But allow me to give a rather rough synthesis of some fundamental components
of the vision for the purposes of this symposium:
It has to be a Church that is Communion, a people of communion with the triune God, with the universal Church, and with the peoples and cultures of Asia. It is a communion of participatory faith-communities.
It is a Church of Solidarity, in active solidarity with the poor in their struggles for the fullness of life, in solidarity with God's creation, defending and promoting its integrity.
As people of God, this Church humbly accompanies, walks humbly with, the peoples of Asia in the common journey to the Kingdom of God, a Reign of justice and peace, truth and love. It is a sign of this divine reigning, and bears, as a herald and servant-community, the Gospel of Jesus, Lord and Savior, who is the Good News of Salvation and Integral Liberation.
For this reason, the Church in Asia must speak, act, and live --out of profound communion with the Spirit of the Lord in an integral spirituality that is truly contemplative, and therefore truly apostolic.
Such is "the new way of being Church in Asia," and this is genuinely reflected in the life of Basic Ecclesial Communities now sprouting like seeds that are harbingers of full life in the Reign of God." (An excerpt, with minor changes, from Orlando B. Quevedo, O.M.I., "An Overview of the Colloquium on the Church in Asia in the 21st Century," Pattaya, Thailand, August 25-3 1, 1997.)
Basic Ecclesial
Communities
The FABC Thrust toward BEC
In the
thinking of FABC bishops the Basic Ecclesial Community (or in some countries,
the Basic Human Community) clearly holds a privileged place in their vision
of new way of being Church.
The Third
Plenary Assembly of FABC, at Sampran, Bangkok, Thailand, in 1982, reinforced
what the First International Mission Congress in Manila (1979) had already
indicated. The Plenary Assembly issued a "Syllabus of Concerns" which included
the following:
Understanding the BEC
Why is
the Asian Church so keen on building Basic Ecclesial Communities? The reason
lies in the very nature of the BEC. At this point we can then ask: "What
is the Basic Ecclesial Community?" It is known by different names such
as Basic Christian Community, Neighborhood Church, Small Christian Community,
Covenant Faith Community. Where Christians live together with peoples of
other faiths, they try to build a "Basic Human Community."
For our
purposes, allow me to take the description of my own colleague, Bishop
Francisco Claver, S.J., as a working description:
The BEC is:
Process and Stages of Development
In Asia,
BECs usually develop because of a pastoral vision and plan, either on a
parish or diocesan level. The first step is a process of communal discernment
regarding the pastoral (social, economic, political, cultural and religious)
situation. Social analysis, cultural analysis, faith analysis are used
in the process of discernment.
A process
of envisioning follows. In the light of the pastoral situation, what kind
of community should the people of God be in this particular geographical
area? How do they envision themselves as church? What kind of mission does
the Holy Spirit call them to fulfill? The formulation of a vision-mission
statement takes place.
The vision
then guides a process of decision-making and planning on how the vision
can be realized and on how the envisioned community can respond to the
pastoral situation in the light of the faith and of the resources of the
community.
The general
process will call for the following components required for the establishment
and growth of BEC:
The "Newness" of the BEC
If the
BEC is considered by FABC bishops as a concrete realization at the grassroots
level of a "a new way of being Church," what does this "newness" consist
of?
In my
own experience with BECs I have found the following transformations taking
place in people and in communities:
b) From sacramentalism and ritualism to integral faith -- members of BECs consider and practice their faith beyond the mere celebration of rituals and sacraments, and are deeply aware of the social implications of their faith on Christian mission and day to day living.
c) From non-involvement to co-responsibility and participation -- in the BECs, church people are impelled by their faith to participate not only in their own intra-BEC activities but also in the outward reach of Church mission into the socio-political community, as an imperative of co-responsibility in mission.
d) From corporal works of mercy to justice -- BECs are very much aware of the importance of traditional works of charity, but their faith impels them to do more and, therefore, to act on behalf of justice and social transformation.
e) From clericalism to lay-centeredness -- in the BECs a paradigm shift takes place regarding the role of clergy and religious and the role of lay people. The principles of co-responsibility and subsidiarity determine both the process and the level of decision-making. A process of "de-clericalization," and a corresponding "lay empowerment," takes place in BECs.
Conclusion
May I simply conclude my presentation with two official recognitions of the Basic Ecclesial Community:
They take root in less privileged
and rural areas, and become a leaven of Christian life, of care for the
poor and neglected, and of commitment to the transformation of society.
Within them, the individual Christian experiences community, and therefore
senses that he or she is playing an active role and is encouraged to share
in the common task. Thus, these communities become a means of evangelization
and of the initial proclamation of the Gospel, and a source of new ministries.
At the same time, by being imbued with Christ's love, they also show how
divisions, tribalism and racism can be overcome. (Redemptoris Missio,
1990, no. 51)
Because the Church is
communion, the new "basic communities, "if they truly live in unity with
the Church, are a true expression of communion and a means for the construction
of a more profound communion. They are thus cause for great hope for the
life of the Church (Extraordinary Assembly of 1985, Final Report,
11, C, 6; cited in RM, no. 51).
END
| Return to FABC Papers Homepage |