|
THE ASIAN FAMILY'S STRUGGLE FOR LIFE by CATHERINE BERNARD HALIBURN |
|
I. The Global Crisis and the Asian Family's Struggle for Life
2. Family in a Technological Society 3. Family and Culture 4. Family - Builder of a New Society 5. Realities of the Child in Asia Today 6. Conflict of Forces at the Various Levels in Asia 1. The Beauty of Human Love 2. Family - the Domestic Church IV. Process Plan for Pastoral Action V. Questions for Workshop Discussion |
| This discussion guide has been prepared for the workshops of the Sixth Plenary Assembly of the Federation of Asian Bishops' Conferences (FABC), convening it Manila, Philippines, January 10-19, 1995. The theme of the Plenary Assembly is: "Christian Discipleship in Asia Today: Service to Life." |
OVERVIEW OF THE WORKSHOP DISCUSSION GUIDE
| I. | At one time, "the family
was the whole of a person's society." Today, it is said that the whole
world has, in a sense, become a "global village," with the family constituting
only a tiny part of it.
In the process of coalition of small social units into larger units, the family underwent a defunctionalization, i.e., functions it used to perform were taken over by institutions or other dominant groups. Some examples of this: education was taken over by schools; entertainment was taken over by theaters and mass media; economic production for almost anything of the family's basic demands, such as food, clothing, etc., is taken over by supermarkets, larger corporations and firms. The care of the handicapped and the aged has become the responsibility of specialized "homes" and institutions. With the advent of family-planning technologies, the privacy of the relationship between husband and wife has likewise been "invaded" by larger units of society. |
| II. | The effects of this defunctionalization process has brought about a displacement of the family from its central role and place in society to the backstage. This has, therefore, deprived the family of its formative and caring functions, as well as of its own unique contribution to society. |
| III. | If the family, in the midst of such a techological and competitive, life-style, must remain a non-formal, non-competitive community, where its members can come home and dare to be themselves, then the larger units of society and their different technologies must remain at its service, and not to be a dictator over it. |
| IV. | It must also be remembered that the family and its members will always remain the objects of the manipulative tendencies of the larger societies and their technologies, which see in them the promise for their commercial and political gains. |
| V. | The family must, therefore, be strengthened, if it is to survive the onslaughts of modern living. The only way to strengthen the family to stand up to or to withstand the tremendous pressures from the outside is to help the family rediscover and respond to its original and central role of "stewards of creation, partners, collaborators and co-creators with God in building a new society." |
| VI. | Such a strengthening process is possible only through an authentic pro-life/family spirituality. |
| VII. | The real challenge to the Church is to respond positively and creatively to the real contemporary Asian society, and to move from listening to intervention, from word to action, thereby making discipleship relevant to the times, faithful to the Gospel, and thus to be committed concretely in "the Asian family's struggle for life." |
In Familiaris Consortio, Pope John Paul II states:
1. The First International Congress on the Family: January 26-February 1, 1983, Madras, India, on the theme: "Family at the Service of Life in Contemporary Society"
The three hundred participants from thirty countries focused their attention and reflected on the theme of the congress. This reflection helped throw light on some of the crucial and sensitive problems that face contemporary family life.
a. In the Perspective of a Just
Society and Common Pilgrimage with All People of Good Will:
We realize that the major problem
that confronts the world at large and the countries of the Third World
is dependence and injustice in human relationships, personal and structural.
This is an interconnected and interacting reality in socio-economic, political
and cultural spheres, at international, national and local levels. Due
to sustained exploitation, oppression and domination by a small minority,
the vast majority of the people have been dehumanized, the gap between
the rich and the poor is ever widening, making the rich richer and the
poor poorer. It is within this situation of injustice that we view the
whole problem of population and poverty (1.2).[2]
b. Problem Identification
It was generally felt that family
life in our countries, although it is beginning to be strongly exposed
to the unhealthy winds blowing from within and from without, still maintains
the basic values of its cultural past. Nevertheless, it was agreed that
it would be unwise to rely too much on our past experience of the traditional
stability and sanity of our families and that adequate steps should be
taken from now to counterbalance the devastating effects of the evils that
are corroding the integrity of so many families (2.1).[3]
In the light of a theological reflection
on the family as a community of love and as a domestic Church, we have
considered the situation of the family, and this reflection has convinced
us that severe fissures and fractures have appeared on the family horizon
in the countries of our region. The family which was meant to be the community
of love, of total self-giving, has thus been affected by the world situation
(2.2).[4]
2. The International Workshop on the Family: December 8-14, 1994, Madras, India, on the theme: "Family in a Technological Society"
The research workshop, which was a
follow-up of the first congress, tried to identify and address more than
just a complex of different technologies in the phenomenon that constitutes
our "technological age."
While "the family" is extremely different,
yet similar in some ways, in the various countries of Asia — in the areas
of culture, customs, economic organization as well as social and demographic
situations, technological growth, etc., it is still possible to identify
common areas in terms of societal problems and trends.
Technology includes many diverse elements
and distinct entities. Yet it is one reality, with varying, interconnecting
and interrelated aspects, all primarily responsible for the dramatic and
rapid changes we experience in almost every dimension of life. These changes
profoundly condition relationships both within the family and society at
large.
This reflection was done by one hundred
participants from seventeen countries and their findings find place in
the statement that emerged at the conclusion of the workshop:
a. In the Context of a Global Society
Within the Interaction Between Family and Technology
The vision maintained throughout the
deliberations of the workshop was a new world which is being reshaped by
the scientific discoveries and technological advances. This vision included
a vivid awareness of the inequality in the distribution of the benefits
of science and technology. The chasm between the "haves" and "have-nots"
would only increase, unless there are greater social justice benefits.
The main concern of the workshop was that the family should so cope with
the new situation so as to be the basis of, and contribute to the emergence
of, a more human, just and ecologically-balanced society. The concern extended
to encouraging the process for realizing universal brotherhood in which
equality and freedom, fellowship and peace, the deepest yearnings of humankind
can be experienced by all, in spite of several forces working to the contrary
(I. 1.1). [5]
The family is the oldest and most
basic human institution and unit of society. More than any other institution,
it has been affected by the profound and rapid changes witnessed by the
world today. Many families are struggling to live in fidelity to authentically
human values, while some others have become totally bewildered. Some even
doubt if the institution has any more purpose at all. However, there are
families which, even amidst the crisis of the present-day society, remain
faithful to the demands of love, justice and solidarity. But the danger
of the human person becoming a victim of a certain technological and consumer
mentality is ever present. In fact, the power of technology may lead people
to control and manipulate not only the environment but also the very lives
of others (1.2). [6]
The situation in which the family
finds itself has both bright and dark spots. Sometimes one feels convinced
that modern times are better than bygone years, while at other times the
so-called progress seems to be an illusion. On the one hand, we find greater
senstivity to an awareness of personal freedom, more meaningful relationships,
and desire to build a more just society. On the other hand, many fundamental
values, like the sanctity of human life, the inherent dignity of the human
person and the sense of responsibility for the world, seem non-existent.
The family is being called up on at this hour to play new roles and be
prepared to meet new challenges. As an enduring human institution and with
its resilience beyond doubt, it can fulfill this task (1.3). [7]
Technology in all its forms is one
of the major factors contributing to the present situation of the family.
Technology in the wider sense of the term is constituted by the manifold
ways in which the person tries to enrich oneself, create a more just society,
master the environment and make this world a better place to live in. Thereby,
the human person ought to become more human. There are families which even
amidst the crisis of the present-day society, remain faithful to the demands
of love, justice and solidarity (1.5).[8]
b. Ambivalence of Technology and
Need for Discernment Before A Vision of Hope
The created reality as it comes from
God's hands is good. The human person, too, shares in this goodness of
creation. But the entire creation, including humankind, has been affected
by evil. Its forces and consequences are visible in human activities and
in the structures of society. This ambivalence colors everything that the
person is and does. Thus, technology too becomes ambivalent. At certain
moments and in certain situations, technology shows forth the greatness
and goodness of the person, while at other times it becomes immensely influenced
by the evil in the person and seems to be one of the forces that seek to
destroy or deform her/him. This calls for a serious discernment, both with
regard to the development of technology and its use (2.1).[9]
In this spectrer we wonder whether
our vision can be realized and our aspiration fulfilled when evil seems
to be so widespread and insurmountable (2.2). [10]
c. Issues
From our discussions the issues which
concern the interaction of technology and the family, grouped themselves
into four: 1) work, 2) mass media, 3) procreation, and 4) health.
All human work is valuable, whether
one is remunerated for it or not. Thus, the work of the wife and mother
in the home and of all members of the family for the maintenance of the
home is worthy of respect. All persons require the necessities of life.
Those who are unable to provide for themselves, whether for reasons of
disability or unemployment, must be helped by society, first of all by
creating employment opportunities. Currently, the basic means of sustaining
life are seldom available for the unemployed (3. 1. 1).[11]
Some workplaces are so substandard
that people are depersonalized, if not almost dehumanized. This is an inverse
of priorities, which demand that the human person must not be exploited
for the sake of production (3.1.2).[12]
A technological society is one in
which the basic relationships are often built on material productivity
or the capacity to produce and not on interpersonal dialogue. This can
easily lead to a new kind of slavery in which people are exploited for
financial gain. Such a society does not place a high premium on building
and maintaining the family as one's "home" but merely as the provider of
one's material needs (3.1.3).[13]
As the result of urbanization and
industrialization many families are now nuclear. The parents of nuclear
families have the full responsibility for the support and guidance of their
children, unlike in previous generations. The press, radio, T.V. and video
have become other forces which compete with the parents in the education
of the young. The mass media, particularly the TV, invade our homes and
bring the world in. This widens our horizon but can also insert unwelcome
ideas. The consumerism which many programs project can compete with more
interpersonal values, to the point where the home may no longer be the
site of re-energizing and fostering of relationships (3.2. j).[14]
The most powerful human functions
are those of thinking, willing and loving. While education is designed
to socialize children into the family, culture and nation, the recently-accepted
population limitation policies have sought to achieve a quick reduction
of family size by a combination of mass media and action-oriented programs
(3.3. 1).[15]
Because of the population problem,
the value of human procreation has been downgraded in the minds of many.
This is a great loss, as it is in the procreating of a person who is our
equal in dignity that we attain the summit of human creativity (3.3.2).[16]
The freedom of conscience of every
person must be respected in the formation of public policy. When there
are substantial differences in life issues, such as sterilization and abortion,
these cannot directly or indirectly be imposed by any individual, group
or authority on anyone (3.3.4).[17]
While sophisticated medical care is
within the reach of a few, comprehensive primary health care is still not
available to vast sections of people (3.4.1).[18]
The gas tragedy in Bhopal has shown
that technological progress, especially in the industrial sector, is often
blind to health hazards, such as environmental pollution (3.4.2).[19]
Advancement in technology that is
insensitive to human values has resulted in the proliferation of nuclear
arms which threaten to annihilate humanity itself (4.4.3).[20]
3. World Congress on the Family: November 1-7, 1986, Madras, India, on the theme: "Family and Culture"
In keeping with the objectives of the
earlier congress and workshop, the World Congress "On Family and Culture"
engaged in a scientific analysis of what constitutes contemporary culture
and its influences on family life in today's society.
In this process the Congress took
stock of what constitutes modern culture and its bearing on actual reality,
its impact on persons and family, with focus on the Asian family.
In line with their deliberations,
the two hundred and forty participants of different religious backgrounds,
from forty-one countries of the world, covering all five continents, stated:
This common search was situated in the context of a socio-political and cultural analysis, together with an exposure to the reality of family life in and around Madras. We visited families in slums, fishermen and agricultural villages, etc. There, through direct contact with the living conditions of families, the participants began to enter into a new perception of the forces that foster and hinder the dignity and wholeness of family and culture (0.4).[22]
a. Family and Culture: An Analysis
of Forces Affecting Them
The family as a basic unit of society
is being subject to blatant and subtle forms of injustice on the local
level, as also on the level of the global community. In our analysis we
have discovered that these forms of injustice are being perpetuated by
socio-economic structures, systems of political power, control of technology
and the ideological use of culture and religion (1.2).[24]
The poverty of many is the price for
the affluence of the few. The production of economic wealth, its use, the
distribution of its benefits and the planning for, as well as the projection
into, the future are all controlled and determined by the powerful few.
This process operates both at the local and global levels as an interrelated
system of economic injustice. Some of the aspects of this system of injustice
are unfair trade practices, developmental aid leading to indebtedness,
child labor, unemployment, racism, forced migration and the unjust treatment
of working women. This also includes the gearing of the economic system
to meet the consumer needs of an elite group rather than to satisfy the
basic needs of the people. All these factors contribute to the deterioration
of the quality of family life (1.3).[25]
We also discovered that political
systems and power structures exercise domination over decision-making processes
in society. Political power, concentrated in the hands of a few, acts as
a powerful support for the maintenance of the oppressive socio-economic
system. The exercise of this kind of political power renders a vast majority
of people powerless and voiceless in deciding their place and role in their
own family and in society. This situation leads the poor to a state of
helplessness and imposes upon them the culture of silence (1.4).[26]
In today's society, with such unjust
socio-economic and political systems, technology is not neutral. With regard
to industrial technology the choices which determine production, distribution
and consumption are made by the privileged few. In recent years advances
in high technology in developed countries have become their exclusive preserve,
making earlier technologies obsolete (1.5.1).[27]
Similarly, communication technologies
are used by the very same few to manipulate information, distort the perspective
of values concerning basic needs and wants, and project particular lifestyles
(1.5.2).[28]
The same distortion is taking place
in the realm of biotechnology, genetic engineering and human reproduction
(1.5.3).[29]
Religion is a force that permeates
human experience, influencing culture and its interweaving attitudes, concerns,
views and perspectives. While the institutionalized form of religion has
often been associated with reaction and oppression, supporting and justifying
the current worldview and unjust structures, it is true that religion has
played a prophetic role in the reform and reconstruction of society. Today
there is an increasing recognition of the plurality of living faiths and
of the value of interreligious understanding and co-operation that go to
assist in the creation of a more humane and just society (1.6).[30]
b. Identification of Areas of Concern
Through a critical analysis of the
forces shaping family and culture, the participants identified the following
areas of concern that needed on-going discernment and response.
The participants discovered the emergence
of a new culture involving the majority of families, one that may be termed
the culture of poverty. Some of the elements of this culture are the presence
of institutionalized violence, a sense of hopelessness and resignation.
At the same time, such a culture also displays a great trust in divine
providence and a fidelity to religious practices, and a strong sense of
solidarity, openness to people and human dignity, despite the subhuman
conditions and the degradation of the environment (2.1)[31]
Unemployment, especially in developing
countries, poses a serious threat to the security and well-being of family
life and brings about a loss of the sense of personal worth. Far from being
a product of the unwillingness of individuals to work, insufficiency of
jobs or a lack of eduation and unemployment are results of systemic injustice
(2.2).[32]
The system of formal education as
it exists in most developing countries domesticates rather than liberates.
This type of education is so well integrated with the system of exploitation
and oppression that it is hardly capable of arousing the consciousness
of people towards social transformation (2.3).[33]
The growing secularization of the
family is pushing religion into a more or less private area of life, thus
depriving it of its social and liberating potential for the family and
society. There is indeed an authentic secularity that rests on the fact
that the world is God's creation with its own legitimate autonomy. This
authentic secularity is being threatened by religious fundamentalism and
communalism and is creating deep divisions in family and society (2.4).[34]
Despite a gathering of momentum in
movements for the liberation of the woman and an affirmation of the equality
of women and men as persons, communities in different parts of the world
show overt and covert forms of male domination and continue to discriminate
against women, thereby creating a low self-image. The contraceptive culture
is a contributing factor to the depersonalization of women (2.5).[35]
The evil of abortion, which in a male-dominated
society appears in the form of selective elimination of female foetuses,
is a denial of the basic right to life (2.6).[36]
Another kind of oppression of the
family appears in the form of child labor, especially in developing countries.
A family has to be on the very edge of despair to let a child go away from
its home to become a breadwinner. Child labor is the product of an unjust
society that creates and maintains unemployment and unjust wages. Child
labor is not just a result of poverty; it is an effect of unjust labor
relations and means of production (2.7).[37]
Technologies for population control
are instruments of the injustices of the global system. Policies of population
control are generally linked with the fear of lowering the standard of
an affluent lifestyle, unfair trade relations, inequitable distribution
of resources and the operation of multinationals. All this leads to the
destruction of conjugal values and the quality of family life. Ultimately,
it is the family itself which discerns and decides its size with responsibility
and in accordance with its welfare and the good of society (2.8).[38]
The effect of the forces enumerated
above has brought about a displacement of the family from its central role
and place in society to the backstage. This has deprived the family of
its formative and caring functions, as well as of its own unique contribution
to society (2.9).[39]
4. International Congress on the Family: March 3-9, 1994, Madras, India, on the theme: "The Family - Builder of a New Society"
The whole process of "modernization"
is an orientation to power, and is manifested in various forms of disorders
in society, such as radical changes brought about by the combined impact
of technology, a state of continuous war, racial conflicts, violence, the
invasion of personal freedom, the decline of humanistic and spiritual values
and the loss of human connectedness.
The ninety-eight participants from
eighteen countries who participated in the Congress, "the Family — Builder
of a New Society," voiced their concern through the statement which marked
the conclusion of the Congress:
a. The Family in the Global Crisis
of the 1990s
There is a global crisis of vast and
profound proportions. The family, the fundamental unit of society, has
been deeply affected by it (1.0).[40]
The challenge to the global society
comes from the overarching process going on in the world, called modernization
(1.2).[41]
Modernization is a process of people
consciously participating in the direction and nature of change as they
encounter new challenges. But the way modernization is actually taking
place is an ambiguous process, especially in its scientific and technological
dimensions (1.2.1).[42]
Science and technology have immense
potential to enhance the quality of human life and happiness. But when
it is controlled by some dominant groups or institutions, whether national
or multinational, whose motive is merely profit, it becomes an instrument
of subjugation, manipulation and exploitation of people. It often creates
an ethos of life characterized by consumerism, materialism and hedonism
for some, and of poverty, oppression and marginalization for others (1.2.2).[43]
Industrialization, another dimension
of modernization, has had disastrous effects on many families in developing
countries of the South. The introduction of certain industrial technology
does not necessarily herald progress. Often it replaces human persons with
machines, leading to mass unemployment. So, on the one hand, wealth and
profit increase for the owners of the machines; and on the other hand,
unemployment and poverty also increase for the workers who have only their
labor to offer. The value theory that supports this sort of industrialization
is the subordination of labor to capital, of the human person to profit
(1.2.3).[44]
Alongside these effects there are
also displacement, uncertainty about employment, even joblessness and redundancy,
due to newer technologies replacing human skills; these have been solidly
linked to the breakdown of family life. Social scientists have generated
data showing that increases in unemployment are associated with rises in
infant mortality, child abuse, alcholism, suicide, heart disease and most
crimes, including murder. Few occurrences short of death have so profound
an impact on family life. This suffering both at the micro and macro-levels
is incredibly costly, to say nothing of the vast waste of human resources.
Inflation too is devastating to family
life. The erosion of the purchasing power of many people during the past
decade not only represents a relentless march towards poverty but it has
undercut most deeply those who can afford it least — the poor and low-income
families.
Rapid urbanization is the process
that usually accompanies industrialization in the developing countries.
There is a mass exodus of peasants, the landless, the destitute and the
youth from the villages to the cities in search of some fringe benefits
from industrialization. Ibis exodus has created innumerable slums and squatter
colonies, which present a pathetic sight of misery and squalor (1.2.4).[45]
There is an urgent need for spiritual
and cultural values to humanize the brutal aspects of economics and politics.
Otherwise, economics becomes only a matter of money and profit, and politics
a selfish struggle for power (1.2.5).[46]
Even Asian religions lose their power
to humanize people when they lose their sense of the trancendent. Religion
emptied of the transcendent dimension of human persons can become either
a personal matter without social responsibility, or an instrument of religious
fanaticism, manipulated by dominant groups (1.2.6).[47]
It is this type of modernization,
controlled by a few dominant groups and institutions, that began in the
developed nations and is now itself in a state of crisis, that has caused
the crisis in most countries of the developing world. For the teeming millions
of families of the South, burdened by the crisis, what began as an energy
crisis in the 1970s became the debt crisis in the 1980s, and now the ecological
crisis in the 1990s. They are impoverished economically, made powerless
politically and are classified as anonymities culturally (1.3).[48]
b. The Encounter of Today's Technological
Culture with Tradition and Existing Patterns of Living
All over Asia, as well as in other
countries of the South, there are millions of families suffering the dehumanizing
effects of the clash between today's technological culture and their own
traditional and existing patterns of living (2).[49]
Today's technology, whether in the
field of industry, communications or medicine, invades and pervades every
facet of human existence. The "apartment culture" has taken over, and the
"luxury apartment" has become the key word in real estate selling. Along
with such a lifestyle, various habits undergo change, e.g., "package-food"
and "fitness-fever" and other items in "personal packaging."
Furthermore, such a culture seriously
distrupts the traditional values and existing patterns of living, often
depriving families of their individual identity and national dignity (2.1).[50]
The massive number of families living
below the poverty line can easily succumb to the disintegrative socio-economic,
political and cultural forces. Many families are fragmented or are one-parent
families. Often they are bystanders and onlookers at their own degradation,
helplessness, alienation and loneliness (2.1.1).[51]
Unfortunately, very often the God-given
dignity of human persons, particularly of women and children, is trampled
upon in physical violence, rape, bride-burning, prostitution, dowry, child
labor and, above all, in the merciless killing of the unborn child (2.1.2).[52]
Yet, despite this terrible onslaught
against the family — husbands, wives and children — there exists a tremendous
resilence of the human spirit, that refuses to be crushed and destroyed
(2.2).[53]
On the one hand, there are families
of good will that have undergone a radical change of self-emptying, from
being immersed in the milieu of the poor. On the other hand, there is the
rising tide of dispossessed families, conscientized and struggling for
their rightful place in society. Together, these two groups can grow into
strong grassroots-level communities, with vast potential to breakdown the
structures of oppression and to build up a new society of justice, peace
and love.
5. Realities of the Child in Asia Today
The former President of Tanzania, Julius
Nyerere, in 1986 asked one of the most critical questions of the decade:
"Must we STARVE our children to pay our debts?"[54]
The World Food Council's Agenda for
the Decade 1990-2000 placed on record that 14 million children under the
age of 5 die every year in the Third World. The same report speaks of street
children — no one knows how many there are! Estimates vary between 100
million and 200 million, Commentators have identified 3 distinct groups:
60% "on the street": i.e., children who work and survive on the street but live with their families.
17% are abandoned: children who live like the others, but with all family ties severed.[55]
Statistics from the International
Labor Organization state that there are 50 million working children in
the world, most of whom are in the most developing countries — in Africa,
Asia and Latin America. Since 1979 the figure has doubled or tripled, says
the same report.
The types of work these children are
employed in are factory, mines, as self-employed street vendors. Little
girls are employed in small industries where they handle metallic wires
which are so fine that they lose their eye-sight before they are six or
eight years old. The vast majority are engaged in agricultural activities.[56]
While International and National Human
Rights and child-oriented agencies are of the consensus that the problem
of sexual exploitation of children has increased dramatically in Asia since
the 1980s, UNICEF calls the problem of children being forced into prostitution
as "one of the most abusive, exploitative and hazardous forms of child
labor," and states that it is becoming more widespread. (The estimated
incidence in Asia is of one million children). Several countries in South
East Asia have admitted that tens of thousands of their children are being
exploited as prostitutes (Thailand, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Viet Nam and
Taiwan). Clearly, given the tender age of these children and the underage
victims, society as a whole and the full range of social institutions,
including the family, have failed to provide a fundamental basic right
— that of protection of the child against sexual and physical abuse, neglect,
cruelty, and emotional maltreatment, exploitation, discrimination and inhuman
degradation. The irony and tragedy are that in these situations not only
are society and parents unable to meet the basic needs of children, they
are also being asked or compelled to sell their bodies to contribute to
their famlly's or society's economic needs and problems.[57]
With regard to health, facts from UNICEF state:
— Nearly one in 70 infants dies before reaching the age of one in the industrial countries, while one in 13 dies before age one in developing countries.
— About four million below five in the developing countries die each year from diarrhoea and related causes. Of these deaths about two and a half million could be prevented by low-cost oral rehydration therapy.
— Everyday, over nine thousand under-fives die in the developing countries from one of the six preventable diseases. And diseases/neonatal tetanus being the largest causes of neonatal deaths.
— About 150 million are malnourished in terms of being underweight for their age.
— Nearly 80% of the population in the developing countries have access to safe water in urban areas, while only about 40% do in rural areas, and about only one-third of the approximately 660 million children under five living in developing countries have access to adequate sanitation.[58]
UNICEF's figures on education state:
— Over one fifth of children of primary school age in the developing countries, that is about 130 million, are not attending school.
— Nearly 60% of children of secondary school age in the developing countries, that is about 280 million, are out of school.
— One-quarter of girls of primary school age in developing countries are not attending school, whereas only one-seventh of boys of the same age and about one-third of primary-enrolled drop out of school before completing four grades.[59]
a. The Child and Family
The continuing deplorable conditions
of children in Asia are often blamed on the parents. However, seldom does
a parent of good mind neglect her/his child. If there is neglect, it is
because of the difficulties the parents themselves are facing.
The child's situation is reflective
of the crisis situation of its parents, just as the crisis situation of
parents are reflective of the crisis situation happening in their community
and in their society.
For nations of the developing and
developed countries, it is noteworthy to analyse how domination — subservience
relations with foreign powers are related to deprivation of food to a hungry
child.
b. The Children and Society
Children are often referred as "the
next generation," for it is through the children that life as a people
continues. Children are the inheritors of the world, not only of development
but of destruction as well.
Being inheritors, however, does not
mean that they have no role in society today. Children are an integral
part of society. They can act and be acted upon by the environment and
vice-versa. They have minds of their own, and at the stage they are in,
they act as persons and parts of society.
Children also contribute to society
in various ways, such as working children trying to earn in order to help
augment family income. Not to mention their contribution in terms of household
maintainance, such as fetching water, caring for younger siblings, etc.
Even infants have a contribution, such as bringing delight to parents'
psyche after a hard day's work.
Children are the most vulnerable to
crisis in society. They have no legal personality, except that of their
parents. Thus, they have no voice in matters affecting their lives. And
in spite of comprising more than half of the population, they remain the
silent majority.
6. Conflict of Forces at the Various Levels in Asia
The social patterns of the modern Asian
community are in a state of continual flux. There is a whole range of violence
used against members of the family — from the overt violence arbitrarily
used by the military against their own citizens, to the violence used by
family members in attempts to resolve conflicts in the family.[60]
It has also been noted that "frustration
over the increasing demands of society is seen as one of the major causes
of breakups and violence in the family. The inability to cope with rising
expectations has led to tension and misunderstanding and family ties are
broken as a result of these tension."[61]
On the more optimistic side, we might
point to the many families in Asia that are trying to live authentic human
and family values, and finding identity, purpose and goal in God their
Creator. Such families become communities of life and love; where every
member accepts responsibility in a spirit of genuine respect and concern,
thus responding to the family's sublime vocation to become co-creator with
God and transformers of society.
II. THE VOCATION OF THE FAMILY: THE BASIS FOR MINISTRY
Introduction
There is no area of human life on which
most people today are so dependent for personal happiness and fulfilment
as that of love between man and woman, a love that is made lasting in marriage
and family life.
There is also no other sphere in which
faith and life are so intimately in contact with each other as in marriage
and family life.
Therefore, the relationship of mutual
partnership between husband and wife in marriage, and that of their relationship
with their children, deserve to be helped, supported and promoted in every
way by the Church — this is the basis for ministry.
1. The Beauty of Human Love
Human love, the love between man and
woman between husband and wife, is so good and so beautiful that it is
considered the most adequate sign of God's love for his people, i.e., the
image and symbol of the Convenant between God and his people. In the encyclical
Familiaris
Consortio, Pope John Paul II highlights the goodness and beauty of
human love when he stresses that the human person created in God's own
image and likeness is called into existence through love and for love,
and that both marriage and virginity are actuations of the most profound
truth of the human person, being "created in the image of God."
In Gaudium et Spes (No. 48
ff.) and Humanae Vitae, the Church has extolled the nobility of
married love, because "it derives from God and finds its supreme origin
in him who is "love," the Father "from whom every family in heaven and
on earth is named."[62]
a. Christ: the Norm for Human Love
Jesus, the Word of the Father who
became flesh himself, consecrates flesh, sex and family life when he enfleshes,
and thus fully reveals, the love of God, showing that love is a total self-gift,
being wholly directed and unswervingly oriented to the other — the other
must live, the other must grow, the other must blossom, the other must
be sanctified, the other must be without spot of wrinkle, the other must
be nourished and cherished as one nourishes and cherishes one's own body.
The intimacy of the marital union, in which the two spouses become one
flesh, most beautifully completes the total self-gift of husband and wife
and resembles most closely God: the Father who is wholly self-giving, the
Son who is the total self-gift to the Father, and the Spirit who is the
fruit of the total self-giving of the Father and the Son. The bodies of
husband and wife thus express a deep spirituality: complete self-gift and
surrender, leading to a communion wherein the being "one flesh," the twoness
of two persons, has almost been overcome. Thus, they express the very oneness
of God's own communion, the oneness of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This
triune God has so blessed and gifted woman and man that their marital union
is the only communion which can bring forth new life. This love is life-giving
and person-creating, and becomes a sign of the creativity and fruitfulness
of God's own love.
The example of this self-giving love
is Jesus himself, who became the grain of wheat that died in order to bring
forth hundredfold fruit (Jn 12:24-25; Phil 2:7). Without a spirituality
that demands constant incarnation, it is difficult for a marriage to maintain
itself. But when this love becomes incarnate, it becomes the most adequate
visible sign of God's own love. In the "beauty of human love" human love
is a given and experienced reality and serves as an adequate term of comparison
for God's love for his people. In Paul's teaching, particularly in 1 Cor
13 and Ephesians 5:21-33, Christ's love is a given, and experienced reality
for Christian spouses. It becomes, therefore, their task and mission to
incarnate that love towards one another, their children and the world.
The more this task is realized, the more Jesus' love becomes a visible
reality in the marital relations. The more adequate it is as a sign, the
more real it is as a sacrament, for a sacrament is a living, dynamic and
on-going event. The sacramental mission begins after the celebration of
the sacrament.
In the family, which Vatican II calls
a school for deeper humanity (GS, No. 52), husband and wife, in
the first place, but also "all the members of the family, each according
to his or her own gift, have the grace and responsibility of building,
day by day, the communion of persons" (FC, No. 21).[63]
Thus family life becomes a lifelong pilgrimage, a yatra, in which
the disciples follow their Guru, Christ who is the center of their
hearts and their home and he who leads them to the fullness of life.
2. Family: the Domestic Church
The family is called the ecclesia
domestica,
(the little Church or the Church in miniature), because
Luke's vision of a Christian community (cf. Acts 2:44-47 and 4:32-35) and
Paul's understanding of the Church as the Body of Christ (cf. 1 Cor 12:12-31)
are most perfectly and visibly realized in the Christian home. Through
the love relationship of parents — with regard to each other and to God
— children grow up in love, learn by experience and come to know in reality
that love is the most precious value in life, and that love is stronger
and more lasting than the future of humankind, in spite of all the countersigns,
and concomitant problems.
Thus the mission of the family can
be specified in the following tasks;
a. Children: the Supreme Gift of
Marriage
"Parents should regard as their proper
mission the task of transmitting human life and educating those to whom
it has been transmitted" (GS, No. 50).[64]
The same document clearly teaches: "Children are really the supreme gift
of marriage and contribute very substantially to the welfare of their parents."
Again, the document explicity links marriage with the task of transmitting
life. In other words, the two partners, who have the inalienable right
to make an honest judgment regarding the number of children (GS, No.
87), must interpret their particular reality and situate it in all its
dimensions in order to arrive at the proper decision. Interpretation implies
that, while transmitting human life, they have to take into account thoughtfully
their own welfare, that of their children, and the material and spiritual
conditions of time and place (GS, No. 50).[65]
Husbands and wives are not masters but stewards of life.
b. Education and Faith-Formation
Parents should not only transmit life
but they must also educate those to whom they transmit life. It is irresponsible
to give life to persons, if the parents cannot educate them, for parents
must be acknowledged as first and foremost educators of their children.
Their role as educators is so decisive that scarcely anything can compensate
for their failure in it. It devolves on parents to create a family atmosphere
so animated with love and reverence for God and others that a well-rounded
personal and social development will be fostered among the children. Hence,
the family is the first school of those social virtues which every society
needs.
c. The Family and Justice
In many developing countries many
families experience social injustice, even within the family (e.g., when
parents deprive children of education, especially the adequate education
of girls), and outside the family (through unemployment and underemployment,
overexpenditure and consumerism, caste and class differences and child
labor). Such families are to be made aware about the contradictions in
society, the roots of these evils, and educate them on the values Christ
stood for and the counter-values in the world around.
d. Family: an Evangelizing Family
The Holy Father referred to it at
Puebla: "The future of evangelization depends in great part on the Church
of the home." The task to share the treasure of our faith is rooted in
our baptism but receives new strength from the sacrament of marriage. Thus,
we are enabled to transmit our faith and to sanctify and transform our
present society according to God's plan" (FC, No. 52).[66]
The Apostolic Exhortation then continues: "Particularly today, the Christian
family has a special vocation to witness to the paschal covenant of Christ
by constantly radiating the joy of love and the certainty of the hope for
which it must give an account. The Christian family loudly proclaims both
the present virtues of the Kingdom of God and the hope of a blessed life
to come."[67]
Conclusion
Pope John Paul II reminds us that:
III. A SPIRITUALITY OF THE FAMILY
Introduction
In the encyclical Centesimus Annus, Pope John Paul II states:
— promoting life
— defending life
— engaging in the dialogue of life.
1. Characteristics of a Spirituality of the Family
a. A Spirituality of Experience
Marriage and family life are experienced
as the most concrete and total incarnation of God who is love, after the
pattern of the Word who became flesh. It is in marital union that the "wholly
being of and for the other" is experienced, lived and manifested; it is
in parental love that the parents wholly empty themselves to give life
to the fruits of their love.
b. A Spirituality of the Mystery
of Being
Once the discovery of the Mystery
of Being is experienced, we can discover it in ourselves, in others and
in God. We arrive at a level of depth at which we can truly be ourselves
and articulate our own experience God's indwelling in both partners and
ultimately in the whole cosmos. This awareness of God's universal presence
is to be lived and shared and constitutes the foundation of a living faith.
In India, this awareness stands at
the basis of Ahimsa: all forms of life are considered sacred and
inviolable as they are manifestations of the Divine. There can be no better
basis for a radical "pro-life" mentality.
c. Marriage: a Pilgrimage, a Yatra:
Several Asian traditions consider
life as a pilgrimage, a movement. The concept of pilgrimage is always important
in marriage spirituality, because it indicates that marriage is a vocation,
a journey during which the two partners, recognizing the richness of each
other's personality, journey towards the Absolute. When the mystery character
of the other is respected and fostered, every new day holds new promises,
new discoveries and marriage becomes a true response to a call, "a vocation."
d. A Spirituality of Renunciation
and Non-Attachment
Renunciation and non-attachment are
the path towards God. It is the secret of divine human love, manifested
in Jesus' life, for he himself became the grain of wheat which fell on
the earth and died. He fully delivered himself for the sake of his Body
the Church. This secret of human/divine love is also the path towards marital
bliss. In the first instance, it is oriented towards the other partner,
and then beyond themselves to God, the fullness of life and love. Both
renunciation and non-attachment are thus great values in marriage spirituality.
This spirituality led Jesus to the supreme sacrifice of the Cross, not
an end in itself, but the passage to life in the Spirit. Marriage therefore
involves yajna (sacrifice), vrata (abstinence) and tapes (asceticism),
i.e., a constant self-gift to the other and others is the guarantee of
a happy and stable marriage.
e. A Spirituality of Freedom
Marriage is a school for deeper humanity.
When the family experiences authentic freedom, it creates a situation in
which persons can be themselves, and be able to respond to their deepest
yearnings, and to others, by total self-gift, and unconditional acceptance
of the other, and the Other (God). These aspects of life are constantly
nurtured. Through this triple response we become whole and universal, free
and authentic, no longer enslaved and subject to bondages.
f. A Spirituality of Wholeness
To live a life of the Spirit and to
experience the Spirit in prayer, meditation and life-situations, one must
gather one's own self at the depth of one's being and experience wholeness.
This wholeness is realized at three levels: cosmic, communitarian (social)
and personal. One must transcend all forms of dualism, integrate from within
one's own self the many elements, parts, senses, levels and layers of which
one is composed. In other words, one should be an integral person. This
is necessary for one's total health well-being, and for the life of the
spirit.
Once a person realizes one's integrity,
one realizes one's identity and becomes an integrated whole, and can enter
into a deep-level communion with others. Hence, the second level of wholeness
is our solidarity and communion with people, which finds expression in
social concerns.
The third level, or dimension, of
wholeness is ecological, i.e., harmony with the environment and cosmos.
By cosmic harmony we mean that our
life in the world is very intimately connected with the atmosphere of the
place where we live and work, with the life of the vegetation and animals,
with the movement of stars and planets. The universe is one and an interrelated
whole, with its various bodies interacting with one another. In this attitude
and awareness, we really become conscious that this universe belongs to
us as part of our being and is necessary for our wholeness, and so we must
enter into communion with it from time to time. Thus, the family's way
of life fosters a rhythm that is truly life-giving for the members of the
family and the neighborhood.
Such a harmony is inclusive and on-going
and can be found in the dynamic movements in Asia, such as the yin and
the yang, where differences are complementary, in the Tao of the
Chinese tradition, where the englobing unity of all reality is founded
on an Absolute that is at once immanent and transcendent, and the Atman
—
Brahman of the Indian Tradition.
g. A Spirituality of the Kingdom
The family is the vital cell of society
and Church. In our world, where so many families live under or around the
poverty line, our responsibility for and our solidarity with the poor should
he constantly nurtured and fostered. This means that husband and wife,
parents and children, must be constantly involved in a process of discernment
of what realizes the Kingdom and what delays its coming. This constant
discernment will greatly determine the family's lifestyle. For it places
the family in the midst of the world and builds up a Christian community
and a conscientized neighborhood, committed to the ushering in of the "new
age," an age of love, of brotherhood and sisterhood, an age of justice
and peace, of social solidarity, of all-round sharing and well-being.
The Dharma Chakra — the wheel
of justice common to Buddhism, Hinduism and Jainism — is found everywhere
and should be kept moving — a moving towards Dharma: lokasamgraha —
lokakashema. One world for all in justice and solidarity.
2. Thus a Spirituality of the Family can be Summarized
as Follows:
| Forces that Shape the Family benefit of a few | Values that Foster Family Spirituality | ||
| 1. | Profit/financial-oriented for the benefit of a few | — | Primacy of the human person in the community for meeting basic human needs. |
| 2. | Highly personalized and individualistic for self-aggrandizement | — | Social awareness, social concern and humanization of person/community |
| 3. | Manipulating, exploiting and using human persons | — | Respect for the person, i.e., the individual, and promotion of human dignity, peace, justice and freedom |
| 4. | Brutal exploitation of limited natural resources for selfish and selfish and self-centered ends | — | Social responsibility for limited resources, concern for the environment and maintaining ecobalance |
| 5. | Cutthroat and breakneck competition | — | Co-operation with and among all sections of the people. |
| 6. | Injustice and aggressivity | — | Self-giving, sharing, love |
| 7. | Hierarchical discipline, concentration of power and social control in the hands of a few | — | Co-ordinated participation and sharing, democratic procedure |
| 8. | Emphasis on quantity and usefulness | — | Values as the criteria for judgement |
| 9. | Consumerism | — | Communion and sharing |
| 10. | Search for pleasure and the good life - hedonism | — | Renunciation |
| 11. | Greed for money, power, obsession of having material goods | — | Detachment, being, spirituality. |
| 12. | Affluence, ostentation, riches, waste, luxury, throw-away society | — | Simplicity of life, self-effacement |
| 13. | Closure on oneself | — | Openness to other, to the other to the Absolute, to transcendence |
3. These Values and their Opposites are:
| Creativity | Destructiveness |
| Freedom | Compulsion |
| Strength | Weakness |
| Independence | Dependence |
| Courage | Caution and retreat |
| Adventure | Security |
| Co-operation | Competition |
| Social Responsibility | Self-indulgence |
| Orderliness | Disorderliness |
| Generosity | Parsimony |
| Inner reality | Appearance, mask |
| Spiritual enrichment | Material acquisition and hoarding |
| Equality and mutual regard | Inequality and striving for power |
| Respect for the human being | The human being viewed as a thing, a pawn, a tool |
4. Community Building
In the last analysis the only real
test of the strength of a family is its orientation to values. With a positive
value-system we need to create human cells, groups, teams which join people
through common goals and activities. Within such groups we revise a new
hope, a kind of connectedness and mutual caring.
Such a spirituality which embodies
the values of the Kingdom will help families to come together in sincere
appreciation of each other and journey together as members of one human
family. These families will engage in dialogue and mutual understanding,
and also have a sincere appreciation for each other's religion and culture
as an embodiment of the experience of transcendence, the ultimate meaning
of life. It will also help families to come together in a spirit of common
service, especially on issues of common and urgent concern.
Thus, in a world filled with individualism,
materialism, injustice and oppression, families will be enabled to play
a prophetic role. Such families will rise against the evil forces that
threaten family and society, and effectively announce with clarity the
faith vision, the dignity of persons, the family and humankind.
Conclusion
The words of the Holy Father to the fifth plenary assembly of the Pontifical Council for the Family, May 1987, are appropriate:
IV. PROCESS PLAN FOR PASTORAL ACTION
Basic Approaches Action
Guidelines for Action
1. How do we meet the challenges posed by an organizational society?
What programs or projects can be developed at the diocesan/national level? Prioritize.2. How far are family patterns of Asian countries capable of resisting a negative cultural impact and contribute to a
different cultural evolution.
What programs or projects can be undertaken at the diocesan/national level? Prioritize.3. How can the family remain true to its intrinsic definition?
How can the family survive and maintain its basic values in the present-day world, where technology is an agent of
change?
What programs or projects can be developed at national/diocesan levels — with regard to value education and
clarification? Prioritize.
V. QUESTIONS FOR WORKSHOP DISCUSSION
1. a. How do you experience the "family as a unit" in your diocese/country?
b. What are the forces that you see that lead to disintegration and dehumanization of the family?
c. What has been the impact of modernity on the family situation in your country?
d. What are the challenges to family life today?
— for the Church's community?
— for the Church's mission?
e. How do you evaluate the opportunities and challenges in the light of an Asian faith perspective?2. a. How can we form persons, Christians and other believers, for their life in a technological society?
b. What concrete steps can we take to promote the experience of family as a community and Church as
communion?
c. How do we encourage collaboration of Christian families with families of other religions in fullfilling our common
prophetic mission in society?
The role of the media — does this create an imbalance of values? How anomalous is this for family life?3. Specify one project that your Church could take up with regard to the family, taking into account the elements or
programs that would help revitalize the family?
1. FC (Familiaris Consortio), No. 6.Published January 1995
2. "Family at The Service of Life," First International Congress on the Family, January 1983, Statement, No. 1.2.
3. Ibid., No. 2.1.
4. Ibid., No. 2.2.
5. "Family in a Technological Society," International Workshop on the Family, December 1983, Statement, No. 1, 1.1.
6. Ibid., No. 1.2.
7. Ibid., No. 1.4.
8. Ibid., No. 1.5.
9. Ibid., No. 2.1.
10. Ibid., No. 2.2.
11. Ibid., No. 3.1.1.
12. Ibid., No. 3.1.2.
13. Ibid., No. 3.1.3.
14. Ibid., No. 3.2.1.
15. Ibid., No. 3.3.1.
16. Ibid., No. 3.3.2.
17. Ibid., No. 3.3.4.
18. Ibid., No. 3.4.1.
19. Ibid., No. 3.4.2.
20. Ibid., No. 4.4.3.
21. "Family and Culture," World Congress, November 1986, Statement, No. 0.3.
22. Ibid., No. 0.4.
23. Ibid., No. 0.5.
24. Ibid., No. 1.2.
25. Ibid., No. 1.3.
26. Ibid., No. 1.4.
27. Ibid., No. 1.5.1.
28. Ibid., No. 1.5.2.
29. Ibid., No. 1.5.3.
30. Ibid., No. 1.6.
31. Ibid., No. 2.1.
32. Ibid., No. 2.2.
33. Ibid., No. 2.3.
34. Ibid., No. 2.4.
35. Ibid., No. 2.5.
36. Ibid., No. 2.6.
37. Ibid., No. 2.7.
38. Ibid., No. 2.8.
39. Ibid., No. 2.9.
40. "International Congress on the Family," March 1991, Statement, No. 1.
41. Ibid., No. 1.2.
42. Ibid., No. 1. 2. 1.
43. Ibid., No. 1.2.2.
44. Ibid., No. 1.2.3.
45. Ibid., No. 1.2.4.
46. Ibid., No. 1.2.5.
47. Ibid., No. 1.2.6.
48. Ibid., No. 1.3.
49. Ibid., No. 2.
50. Ibid., No. 2.1.
51. Ibid., No. 2.1.1.
52. Ibid., No. 2.1.2.
53. Ibid., No. 2.2.
54. Agri Missio — April 15-19; "Children at the Centre," International Conference on Agriculture and Environment,
July 1991.
55. Ibid.
56. I.C.C.B.: Vol. 15. No. 1/1988 — "World Wide Exploitation of Working Children," quoted from Labor
Communications, July 1987, cited in "Child Workers in Asia," April - September 1987. Vol. 3.
57. Chow Hiew, in Children WorldWide — Issue International Year of The Family, "Child Resilience Programs:
A Response to Sexually Exploited."
58. Duque L. Rosalinda, "The Rightful Place of Children in the Family and in Society," paper presented at Fourth
International Workshop "Family-Builder of A New Society," Madras, India, March 1991, quoting from UNICEF's
Facts and Figures 1990.
59. Ibid.
60. Editorial — "The Role of The Family in Conflict Resolution," Asia Link, Hong Kong, . Vol. 16, No. 1, 1994.
61. Ibid.
62. Ep. 3:15, quoted in Humanae Vitae, encyclical letter of Pope Paul VI, 1968, No. 8.
63. FC (Familiaris Consortio), No. 21.
64. GS (Gaudium Et Spes), No. 50.
65. Ibid., No. 50.
66. FC, No. 52.
67. Ibid., from Lumen Gentium, No. 35.
68. FC, No. 86.
69. CA (Centesimus Annus), No. 39.
70. D.S. Amatorpavadass, Keynote address, World Family and Culture Congress, Madras, India, 1986.
71. HV (Humanae Vitae), No. 9.
72. FC (Familiaris Consortio), No. 50.
END
| Return to FABC Papers Homepage |